Communication Versus Confrontation
I wrote this about two weeks ago and decided to post it today.
I hope you take the time to read it all the way through. I also hope it makes sense or adds some value to your lives. Please comment if you feel so inclined (or just comment so I know you read it!).
-------------------------
I’ve been thinking a lot lately about relationships, but
more specifically, friendships. I think often of the times that I’ve hurt other
people. And I assume there have been many times I have hurt others that I don’t
even know about. If I did know about it, I’m sure I wouldn’t forget, since I
still beat myself up over things I did when I was like 11. But that’s beside
the point. There have also been times people have upset or frustrated me, and I
haven’t told them about it.
This got me pondering the topic of communication versus
confrontation. When should we express ourselves?
I believe it is very important to communicate. I think this
includes positive and negative feelings. I don’t think this includes all our
feelings. When we air all of our feelings, it’s more like confrontation than
communication.
Our interactions with people can be very complex. We are
perceived in ways we may not have intended. We make people feel things we may
not have intended. This complexity brings with it the need to be extremely
patient with and forgiving of others, and hope that they do the same for us.
And I think that both should be offered freely, and that we don’t necessarily
need to tell somebody every time we forgive them. We can just do so, and let
things go. Choose your battles, so to speak.
This begs the important question: how much is too much?
Well, I guess you have to be the judge of that in your own life. What things in
relationships or friendships are “deal breakers” to you? For example, how often
are you going to keep trying to make plans with somebody who flakes every time?
Maybe you are a flaky person yourself, so this kind of thing doesn’t bother
you. Or how many times are you going to want to go out with somebody who is
always late? Maybe you’re always late, so tardiness just doesn’t bother you.
…Or maybe these things bother you a lot. You have to know
yourself, and you have to know what you can accept, and what you can’t.
You also need to know what you expect; define your
expectations. Are you the kind of person who has to hang out or have contact
with people frequently? It goes without saying, you should probably find
somebody who has that same idea of friendship, or who can meet those
expectations. You probably have a friend you’re OK with seeing every month or
two, or every year. You probably have a friend whose company you enjoy more
often, or you want to talk to them every day. Some you are OK being casual
acquaintances with, and others you want for closer friends. Whatever the case,
you need to know what your expectations are, whether someone can meet them, and
whether you want to keep them around if they can’t or won’t. It may also be
worth examining whether your expectations are unrealistic.
Since people are complex, they bring lots of different
things to the table. Think of each of your different friendships. It’s likely
you don’t get the same thing out of each of them. Each person you know has
something different to offer (I’m going to refer you to the movie Clueless for a quick review on this
topic). They have different amounts of time and energy, and different ideas of
what makes a good friendship. If somebody has less time or less energy to
offer, does that mean you don’t want to be friends with them? Can you keep them
around if they don’t meet your expectations?
I think we each have to determine what positive things
somebody brings to the table, and then decide if their negatives are worth the
cost. When we are friends with someone, when we accept someone, when we love
someone, we embrace them completely, good and bad. Sure, we recognize what
their shortcomings are. But when you’ve decided that those things aren’t deal
breakers, that they’re bringing enough good into your life, the shortcomings
just don’t matter. They’re not a focus.
Now, if you’ve accepted somebody, good and bad, does that
mean that there are things you shouldn’t communicate to them if they do fall
short? Absolutely not. If someone is a repeat offender, if they do something
often enough that it has started bothering you, if it’s taxing you in some way,
bring it up. If it’s hurt you deeply, if you just can’t move on without talking
about it, bring it up.
It’s also quite unfair to be mad at somebody and not tell
them about it. How are they supposed to fix their mistake if they don’t know
they’ve made one? It’s also unfair to you, because you’re walking around with
baggage, and it’s due to somebody else’s actions. You have to communicate in
order to be fair and let people improve or fix things, and in order for you not
to carry a burden.
And here is where I will go back to an earlier point. You
need to decide what is worth mentioning. Not every single little thing is worth
talking about. Some things just need to be let go—be patient and forgive
freely, remember? I’d go so far as to say it’s best if you can practice letting
most things go, as it will help your
mind and heart feel free more often; don’t chain your feelings to the actions
of others. Plus, constantly bringing up your dissatisfaction with somebody is
bound to ruin your relationship. Let things go.
I’d like to take a minute to make an important clarification
here. Since we’ve talked about deal breakers, defining expectations, and
communicating… It’s important to note that if you haven’t made your expectations
clear, and you talk to someone about something that upset you, then it is
confrontation, not communication. Communication should lead to an improvement
or change in the relationship.
To sum up, and answer my initial question, “When should we express
ourselves?”
1.
When it is impossible for you to forgive and let
it go.
2.
When the hurt is too deep.
3.
When the offense has been repeated, and you see
it affecting others too.
4.
When you have defined and communicated your deal-breakers
and expectations beforehand.
5.
When it will lead to improvement or positive
change for one or both.
With relationships, I think it’s really important to reflect
often, mostly on yourself as a person rather than on the actions of others. How
many of these confrontational interactions have you had? Have they been often?
Have they been with the same people? Most importantly, who started these
interactions?
It’s important to be honest with yourself. Have several
people brought up the same topics with you? Is it something you can improve
upon? Is this action of yours affecting others negatively? If it’s a
personality flaw, how can you improve it?
Additionally, how many healthy, stable friendships do you
have in your life? Have you lost a lot of friends? How did you lose those
friendships? Are you glad to not have them anymore? Is it because they didn’t
meet your expectations? Did they know your expectations?
At some point, we just have to accept what others are
offering. People are complicated. They have good and bad qualities. Some of
them we have no choice accepting (family). With a few people, we decide they
don’t bring enough good into our lives to be worth the cost. But most people
bring good and bad. Most people have a lot to offer—just maybe not the same
things as you. So, can you meet them part way? Can you gladly accept what they
bring to the table, dismiss their shortcomings, and bring up only the things
that must be brought up?
I hope so. People are worth it.
Comments